was the biggest predatory shark that ever lived, and its young were also gargantuan; at birth, they were as big as the average basketball player. Megalodon
How did bouncing baby megalodons fuel their impressive embryonic growth? They may have gobbled up their smaller siblings while still in the mother’s womb, a survival strategy shared by some modern sharks.
Researchers recently calculated the size of megalodon babies by analyzing skeletal fossils of an adult
Otodus megalodon that measured about 30 feet (9 meters) long when it died (these monster sharks could likely reach about 66 feet, or 20 m). The scientists then looked at “growth rings” in pieces of the shark’s preserved skeleton, similar to the rings in tree trunks used to determine a tree’s age.
Related: 7 unanswered questions about sharks
Megalodon — and all sharks, skates and rays — belong to a class of fishes called Chondrichthyes, which have skeletons made of cartilage rather than hard bone. Extinct cartilaginous fish like megalodon and other megatooth sharks are therefore known mostly from their teeth, which were made of calcium and therefore survive in the fossil record longer than these fishes’ delicate cartilaginous skeletons.
But for the new study, published online Jan. 11 in the journal
, the authors examined a rare collection of 150 megalodon vertebrae whose cartilage had mineralized, “the only reasonably preserved vertebral column of the species in the entire world,” they wrote. Historical Biology
tomography (CT) scans, the scientists counted 46 regularly-spaced growth rings in three of the megalodon’s vertebrae. They then applied a mathematical growth curve equation that’s commonly used to calculate growth patterns in modern sharks, based on growth bands in their spinal cartilage, said lead author Kenshu Shimada, a professor of paleobiology at DePaul University in Chicago and research associate at the Sternberg Museum in Kansas. X-ray
Identified annual growth bands in a vertebra of the extinct shark Otodus megalodon, along with hypothetical silhouettes of the shark at birth and death, each compared with size of a typical adult human. (Image credit: DePaul University/Kenshu Shimada)
Each ring represented a year of growth, so the shark would have been about 46 years old when it died. By working backwards to the earliest growth ring — the “band at birth” — the scientists calculated the shark’s length as a newborn, estimating it to be around 6.6 feet (2 meters) long — bigger than any known newborn sharks. While prior studies had noted the presence of these rings in megalodon fossils, “no detailed analyses had been conducted prior to this new study,” Shimada told Live Science in an email.
Such large babies would likely have been born live, the study authors reported. Nourishing such enormous young would have carried high energy costs for the mother, suggesting that her babies supplemented in-utero nutrients with a side helping of unborn sibling cannibalism, Shimada said.
“Oophagy — egg-eating — is a way for a mother to nourish its embryos for an extended period of time,” he explained. “The consequence is that, while only a few embryos per mother will survive and develop, each embryo can become quite large at its birth.”
Examination of the vertebrae’s rings also revealed the shark probably grew slowly, with a slightly higher growth rate during its first seven years of life. Based on the space between rings, the megalodon didn’t experience a rapid growth spurt in its youth as some animals do. Perhaps that’s because it was already big enough at birth to compete for food and discourage predator attacks, the study authors reported.
By combining the growth trajectory findings with data about body size in the largest known individuals, the researchers estimated that megalodon sharks may have lived to be at least 88 to 100 years old. However, this inferred life expectancy “remains rather theoretical and needs further investigation,” Shimada said.
Originally published on Live Science.